Buried Child is seemingly realistic,
showing a piece of everyday life for a pretty regular, albeit incredibly crazy,
dysfunctional, farming family. On the outside, you’d expect it to be fairly
true to life since it deals with everyday events, and horrible, but still
possible, secrets. The problem with this play, however, is that through closer
inspection, there are things that just don’t make since in the lifelike
setting. There’s mysterious corn, for example, that none of the characters have
planted. At first we think they are crops that Tilden stole from the neighbors,
but at the end we hear Halie exclaim that there are all sorts of crops growing
outside. This is left completely unexplained, and ambiguous. Another thing that
does not seem to fit into the realism of the play is Vince’s speech about
running away. He says that he was driving, but then he saw the reflections of
his family members, even people he hasn’t ever seen before. Now, until this
point, Vince has been a fairly normal guy, but this incident changes him drastically.
He becomes like a new Dodge. Finally, there is the fact that upon Vince’s first
arrival with Shelly, no one recognizes him except Halie. It leaves many
questions. Why does his own father not recognize him and why is Halie the only
one that does? These strange occurrences that don’t exactly fit into the
illusion of realism blur the lines between the family’s insanity, and the
physical world of the play. The audience is left uncertain of what was and wasn’t
“real”.
Your response to this prompt was very concise and well-written. I agreed exactly with what you said and appreciated the way you presented your answer as it was easy for me to follow, and referenced the story very smoothly. I was also confused with the corn motif, that was one of the first things I thought about when I read the prompt and began brainstorming about moments of irony, complexity, and ambiguity. I agreed entirely with all of the elements you viewed as one of the characteristics just mentioned.
ReplyDelete